I suppose Paul
Theroux’s travel writing isn’t for everyone. If you don’t like his traveling persona
you aren’t likely to enjoy his books. That being said, I like his traveling
persona, so every travel book is a pleasure and there are still books to be
read. But I decided to read The Old Patagonia Express because a friend reminded
me that he travels to South America in this book. South America is a place that
I have had a recent interest in and this summer I made my first visit to the
continent when I attended a conference in Peru. I often travel alone like
Theroux, for different reasons perhaps. Theroux writes about travel being its
best as a solitary experience in that you get to see, examine, assess alone,
which is something that requires that you be unencumbered with a companion. I’m
not sure that I completely agree but I feel that traveling alone does give you
this perspective. In my case few people have the time or inclination to travel
the way I do, so I tend to visit friends in far flung places and combine work
with leisure travel. I would rather have companions, but I agree that you have
better mediation while traveling alone with the time and peace to think clearly
without the company of other people.
I am also an
avid reader and traveling gives you ample time to read, something, which
Theroux always incorporates into his travel writing. During this trip he takes
a somewhat academic approach. During the first leg he reads obscure novels from
some of America’s most famous authors: The
Wild Palms by Faulkner, Pudd’nhead Wilson
by Mark Twain, The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of
Nantucket by Edgar Allen Poe, and The
Assassination Bureau, Ltd. By Jack London. Of these he has persuaded me to
read the Twain and Poe works, the Poe novel he called the most horrifying novel
he has ever read. Some of his other light reading includes The Life of Samuel Johnson by Thomas Boswell (he read this large
tome twice! on the journey) and The
Pledge: Requiem for the Detective Novel by Friedrich Durrenmatt. In the
final chapter he visits Jorge Luis Borges and reads him Kipling, it seems that
while he was traveling The New York Times book review ran an article by Theroux
on Kipling so he was able to visit Borges who he shared a publisher with. In
fact, Theroux’s whole section on Argentina was so complimentary that he inspired me
to give up my plans for going to Brazil next year for a conference in favor of
Argentina. This books comes across as somewhat exotic since it was written in
the late 70s when there were many dictators and eroding states in Central and
South America. The Peru and Panama he writes of no longer exist and are far
different from what I encountered in visits to these two countries in the last two
years. Panama is thriving as they expand the canal, which was still in dispute
when Theroux visited where he stayed among the American Zonians. He had no
affection for Torres the way that Graham Greene did, who was visiting Panama
during the same time. Peru was a backwater and had yet to endure the long terrorist-counterterrorist
war of the 90s. It is now one of the leading economies in South America. In addition, he does an excellent
job of describing and characterizing those budget travelers who boast of the currency exchange
rates and $5 a day budgets-among the most tedious of travelers in my
opinion, of which there is no shortage of in SE Asia. While traveling through
Costa Rica he talks of inspiration for a novel set there on the Mosquito Coast
about a family of castaways based on the missionaries he sees while traveling
in Central America. This would, of course, becomes one of his great successes, the novel The Mosquito Coast (which was subsequently
made into a film starring Harrison Ford). I really enjoyed this book and it gave
me a lot of food for thought, inspired me to seek out some of those
forgotten American classics as well as move Argentina up on my list of
countries to visit.
Recent Comments