Kate Elwood always has some interesting observations about cultural differences between Japanese and Americans and the latest from The Daily Yomiuri focuses on the concept of fairness:
Fairness, of course, is a concern for both Japanese and Americans,
but there are differences in the way the two cultures engage with the
concept. Social psychologist Michele Gelfand and other researchers
conducted a variety of studies related to fairness among Japanese and
U.S. students. In the first study, they asked the students to write down
all the fair behaviors that came to mind in five minutes, and in
another five minutes to write down all the unfair behaviors that
occurred to them. If the behavior recorded was something they did more
frequently than other people, they were told to begin the statement with
"I" and if it was something others did more than the participant, to
begin it with "They."
The U.S. students wrote more than twice as many statements related
to fair behavior beginning with "I" than they wrote "I" unfair
statements. Similarly, the Americans' "they" unfair statements were
almost twice as frequent as their "they" fair statements. On the other
hand, the Japanese "I" fair statements were only slightly greater than
their "I" unfair statements, and the same was true of the difference in
frequency between their "they" unfair and "they" fair statements.
In another study, the researchers asked different groups of U.S. and
Japanese students to write down a conflict that they had personally
been involved in. They were then asked to imagine how a neutral third
party might view the actions of both the participant and other person
involved in the conflict. The Americans were much more likely to believe
that the impartial evaluator would consider their behavior fair and
their counterpart's unfair, than the Japanese respondents were.
In yet another study, participants were asked to engage in a
negotiation activity. Afterward, they were randomly assigned positive,
negative or neutral feedback regarding their negotiating effectiveness
compared to the performance of all the other participants in the study.
Then the participants were asked to evaluate whether they felt
personally responsible for the feedback they had received. The Americans
were more likely to accept personal responsibility when the feedback
was positive than when it was neutral or negative, but the Japanese were
less likely to accept responsibility when the feedback was positive
compared to the two other evaluations. Similar results were obtained
when the participants were asked how confident they were that the
feedback reflected their abilities.
Gelfand and her colleagues suggest one reason for the cultural
differences in the results of their tests is the Japanese emphasis on
hansei, a term used to describe the practice of thinking over one's
actions, both good and bad, with an eye to future improvement. Such
training in a more self-critical approach, the researchers argue, is
likely to result in a divergent outlook on "fair" assessments.
The introspection focus begins early: Early childhood education
specialist Satomi Izumi Taylor and her colleagues made a survey of the
attitudes of 143 people--teachers, parents and grandparents--to hansei
among kindergartners. In response to whether it was important for the
children to engage in hansei, 132 answered "very important" and only two
answered "not important at this age."
Japanese people certainly care about fairness. I'd even venture to
say that in some situations I've witnessed they have been "obsessed"--in
a very good way--with it. Perhaps what the Japanese student from way
back was remarking on was a significant difference in assurance in
making fairness allocations regarding one's own actions.
Recent Comments