I think there are some divisions out there between film critics and there are a few who rarely let me down. These critics are often funny, witty, profound, literate and have the power to steer me toward or away from films, thus making my film selection process that much easier.
Andrew O'Heir, Salon: O'Heir writes the sublime "Beyond The Multiplex" column that focuses on non-mainstream films. His taste is impeccable and seems very compatible with my film sensibility. Actually, it was his review of Tony Manero, which made me want to see it that inspired this post.
Roger Ebert, Chicago Sun Times: I grew up watching his reviews on "At The Movies." But it wasn't until college that I discovered his written reviews an found a kindred spirit. Being a dedicated reader and former Literature major, I appreciate the multitude of literary references. I think this classic review of Errol Morris' The Thin Blue Line inspired me to seek it out in college.
Dana Stevens, Slate: I really like Stevens' sensibility. I also enjoy listening to her on Slate's Culture Gabfest. I'm not sure if I can think of a seminal moment when I realized she was a valuable reviewer for me, but here she takes down the latest Woody Allen film, "Whatever Works."
Anthony Lane, The New Yorker: Lane might be the most entertaining to read stylistically, however, we might have some slight differences of opinion on occasion. Here he is on Star Track.
Comments