Marxy, of the Neomarxisme blog, has an interesting post/analysis of how structured Japanese society is in relation to employment:
No Chances in the Early Days of the "Second-Chance Society"As reported on 2-ch's Itai News Blog, Kinki University in Osaka is telling juniors they must take a job right outside of graduation in the traditional "shinsotsu saiyou" (新卒採用) system. Why? "Because there are no second chances." (「2度とチャンスはありません。」) What about becoming a freeter? "Your life will come to nothing." (「フリータやニートになっては,人生台無しです。」) Surely, waiting to apply a year or two after college, you could still get a job based on your qualifications, right? "Dead wrong. Society will not accept you. Why? Because those who did not start working right outside of graduation are leftovers and defective merchandise." (「卒業してからでも大卒の資格で何とかなるわ…と思ったら大間違いです。 社会は受け入れてくれません。 何故なら,新卒で就職出来ていない人は落ちこぼれであり,欠陥品だからです。」)
All of the 2-ch commenters of course agree with this harsh analysis, and the message does not conflict with the standard understanding of Japanese education/employment systems. Let's face it: perfectly ordered society and second-chances are total opposites. The only way to enforce order is to guarantee that those going around the determined path will be permanently punished. The kid doesn't even get the chance to cry "wolf" the first time? Problem solved. Taking a year off to study for Tokyo University exams is one thing, but taking a year off to think about what you would like to do for the rest of your life... might as well be treason.
As much as the post-Bubble period was host to greater "Americanization" of the economy, the rigid employment system is facing no serious challenge. In fact, with more and more companies creating two distinct classes of "regular" and "non-regular" workers, the shinsotsu system becomes crucial for determing who gets to join the upper classes and who gets to receive the same limp salary for 30 years - within the same companies, even. Successfully making it to a four-year university in the first place means you have access to a possible corporate track job, and clearly, Kinki U. does not want to see their young get swept out into the harsh winter colds from which there is no return.
One of Prime Minister Honest Abe's big ideas for Japan is the "second chance initiative" for failed businesses. Students, however, may not be afforded that luxury. At least they will know at 22 whether their lives are total failures or not. Most people have to wait 40 years to find that out on their own.
You almost never see older students in Japanese universities-it seems you have to make your life decisions at 22 and follow through to the bitter end. It will be intersting to see if this changes in the next 20 odd years or if they continue to push through with the traditional norms.
I'm pretty much on my 3rd chance right now, having opted out of the standard career path on two occasions. I'd say Australia, which I think prides itself on being egalitarian (a 'fair go' is how we put it), is about as far from Japan in this respect as it could be. Ironically my employer here, Toyota Australia, is a prime example of giving people a 'fair go' within the employment system. A female coleague ho joined at the same time as I did (the first time around in 99 - she was just 21), and who I then worked with for my first 3 years before I went overseas, is now at the same middle management level as I, and this is someone who left school at 16 and had only completed a kind of womens college course where they actually taught 'deportment' - whatever that is (books on heads I think). Nevertheless she was intelligent, logical and dedicated to work, and while I was away for 4 years was able to work her way up to marketing manager. Many of the big bosses here lack a formal education of the type I've had, and although it's less common nowadays, my colleague and I show that neither a formal education nor a typical career path are entirely essential in this country. I imagine this type of story would be unheard of in Japan. How do you think America would compare on this point?
Posted by: Edward | November 27, 2006 at 11:19 AM
Oops, the word 'ho' was meant to be 'who' - don't want anyone to get the wrong idea.
Posted by: Edward | November 27, 2006 at 11:21 AM
Hmm I always thought of America as the place where anyone can succeed and where people can many second acts and second chances. Bill gates dropped out of Harvard to start his college-many of America's most wealthiest are from humble backgrounds rather than from privileged upbringings-however Bill gates isn't one of them-but there are a lot. It seems to me England used to be like Japan that if you didn't get into the university prep courses you were doomed to servile blue collar jobs .
It's my point about older more experienced students can be seen in Community College and University classrooms and they are more motivated than most of the college kids because they aren't trying find themselves or partying what ever they are focused. Most people would see living abroad or trying something else before university a good thing -in Japan you are punished for it. I went to junior college before transferring to the main public university in my state. (Mainly to save money but also because I didn't apply to mare than one college and decided not to go there). I felt that I was more motivated than a lot of my friends since I had to work harder to get in, so I wanted to make the most of it once I was there.
One of my most interesting student took a year off and worked and traveled the world before enrolling in college. He was upset at how passive and unmotivated his classmates were. Here it's much harder to work outside the system, and be rewarded in a conventional way.
Posted by: MC | November 27, 2006 at 11:04 PM
Yes, I think England's a bit closer to Japan in this way - it's simply more conservative, and so if you try and go outside the system then I think people are less likely to accept you. Mind you, this is based on my limited experience there as an adult.
Posted by: Edward | November 28, 2006 at 11:00 AM