« March 2004 | Main | May 2004 »

April 29, 2004

Granta 77: What We Think Of America

I was inspired to get Granta 77: What We Think About America (2002), after reading the recent Granta 84: Over There. I made a back order with Granta and after they processed it, which took a couple of days, it was here in like three days! Amazing. The highlight was the commentary by 24 writers about America including the likes of Harold Pintner, Doris Lessing, and Ivan Klima. I also really like Jihadis by Pankaj Mishra, an Indian journalist, about his life in Saudi Arabia where he documented the terrible petty bureaucratic tyrants, corruption, and inefficiency or Middle Eastern cultures. Where he says people have very little of anything, but time. "Mecca" by Ziauddin Sardar was also an interesting piece on Islam. I also enjoyed Blake Morrison's memoir and analysis of his parent?s wartime correspondence called "Have You Decided to Love Me Yet." Here are some interesting comments about America:

Ian Buruma (Germany/Holland/Britain) wrote:

I still feel a schoolboyish thrill every time I go to America, and an exhilarating sense of lightness when I get there. Chatting to strangers somehow becomes easier. The burden of European caginess, and of the snobberies and class prejudices left behind, like crusty scales, by a European education, appears to be lifted. The feeling never entirely wears off, even when the drawbacks of American society-the sentimentality, the conformism, the insularity-become more apparent.

Ariel Dorfman (Chile) wrote:

In the years since I've come to realize how comfortable it is to employ anti-Americanism as a way of avoiding the faults and deficiencies of our own societies, even though such self-criticism should not prevent us from assigning blame to Americans when that blame is due, which it often is. The United States has such incommensurate power to good or evil, and has set itself high standards of freedom and tolerance by which to be measured. But I am wary today, so many years later, of the automatic response of the kind that briefly, as I recall that afternoon, led me to deny our common humanity as that child descended into the cold quiet maelstrom of those waters.

Benoit Duteurtre (France) wrote:

So America's aim is to impose its economic system on the whole world? In fact Europe voluntarily chose this system and now in turn imposes it on countries that want to enter the EU. So the violence of American society couldn't be further from Europe?s welfare system? Rhetoric aside, over the last thirty years France has allowed the growth of urban ghettos comparable to the worst of the American inner cities. So the European mind rejects the leveling-down effects of American culture? Yet it was a French socialist government that invited and financed the creation of Euro Disney. And besides, one might do well to wonder about the seductive power of American cinema or music, which have such a grip on the contemporary world, whereas European art can seem imprisoned in its culture pretensions.

Sculpture #3

img_0915.jpg

April 27, 2004

Artist Residency Tokyo: Exhibition

img_0946.jpg

Yesterday, actually it was earlier tonight, I went to a gallery opening, I was hoping the website had the pertinent details, because I didn't take any notes, but there is no website. However, an Israeli photographer did a sort of photo essay on an average Israeli sodlier who lost his legs in combat. The photographer followed him from his injury to rebilitaiton and beyond. I would guess that after such an experience you would become cynical and question why you did what you did, however, I can see how one could also become more commited to the cause that he or she was fighting for. In this case, the person in question felt as though he had made a sacrifice to his country's survival-and from what I could gather from the quotes that accompanied the pictures, this was the case. The pictures were very thought provoking and emotional.

img_0945.jpg

This was one of my favorite pictures. The legless man sees the army march at leg level. The perspective is appropriate. It was a fascinating production, I would have liked to have learned more about his subject-why him? A friend?

Sculpture #2

img_0914.jpg

April 26, 2004

Sculpture #1

img_0913.jpg

This a sculpture near a park in Myogadani, kids play on it. The first of a series.

Sofia Coppola

526-feat-sofia3_thumb.jpg

The feature article this week in Metropolis is on beautiful and talented Sofia Coppola. Now that she's divorcing Spike Jonze, maybe I have a chance.

April 25, 2004

Foolish Consistency...

I read this great editorial about undue importance given to flip-flopping politicians in the Chicago Tribune supplement in The Daily Yomiuri this morning.

Ricky Gervais

Here's an interesting interview with Ricky Gervais from the very funny TV series The Office.

Media Bias

The Japanese hostages have been getting terrible tretment from the government and media. It seems that this could only happen in Japan, people being blamed for getting kidnapped.

This is from the NYT April 22, 2004:

For Japanese Hostages, Release Only Adds to Stress
By NORIMITSU ONISHI

TOKYO, April 22 The young Japanese taken hostage in Iraq returned home this week, not to the warmth of a yellow ribbon embrace but to a disapproving nation's cold stare.

The first three hostages, including a woman who helped street children on the streets of Baghdad, first appeared on television two weeks ago as their knife-brandishing kidnappers threatened to slit their throats. A few days after their release, they landed here on Sunday, in the eye of a peculiarly Japanese storm.

"You got what you deserve!" one Japanese held up a hand-written sign at the airport where they landed. "You are Japan's shame," another wrote on the Web site of one of the hostages. They had "caused trouble" for everybody. The government, not to be outdone, announced it would bill them $6,000 for airfare.

Treated like criminals, the three have gone into hiding, effectively becoming prisoners inside their own homes. The kidnapped woman was last seen arriving at her parents' house, looking defeated and dazed from taking tranquilizers, flanked by relatives who helped her walk and bow deeply before the media, as a final apology to the nation.

Dr. Satoru Saito, a psychiatrist who has examined the three twice since their return, said the stress they are enduring now is "much heavier" than what they endured during their captivity in Iraq. Asked to name their three most stressful moments, the ex-hostages told him, in ascending order: the moment when they were kidnapped on their way to Baghdad; the knife-wielding incident; and the moment they watched a television show, on the morning after their return here, and realized Japan's anger with them.

"Let's say the knife incident, which lasted about 10 minutes, ranks 10 on a stress level," Dr. Saito said in an interview at his clinic today. "After they came back to Japan and saw the morning news show, their stress level ranked 12."

Beneath the surface of Japan's ultra-sophisticated cities lie the hierarchical ties that have governed this island nation for centuries and that, at moments of crises, invariably reassert themselves. The ex-hostages' transgression was to ignore a government advisory against traveling to Iraq. But their sin, in a vertical society that likes to think of itself as classless, was to defy what people call here "okami," or, literally, "what is higher."

To the angry Japanese, the first three hostages Nahoko Takato, 34, who started her own non-profit organization to help Iraqi street children; Soichiro Koriyama, 32, a freelance photographer; and Noriaki Imai, 18, a freelance writer also interested in the issue of depleted uranium munitions had acted selfishly. Two others kidnapped and released in a separate incident Junpei Yasuda, 30, a freelance journalist, and Nobutaka Watanabe, 36, a member of a pro-peace non-governmental organization were equally guilty.

Pursuing individual goals by defying the government and causing trouble for Japan was simply unforgivable. So the single government official to praise them was, not surprisingly, an American one.

"Well, everybody should understand the risk they are taking by going into dangerous areas," said Secretary of State Colin Powell. "But if nobody was willing to take a risk, then we would never move forward. We would never move our world forward.

"And so I'm pleased that these Japanese citizens were willing to put themselves at risk for a greater good, for a better purpose. And the Japanese people should be very proud that they have citizens like this willing to do that."

As an example of the unbridgeable gap between Japan and America, consider this comment by Yasuo Fukuda, the government's spokesman: "They may have gone on their own but they must consider how many people they caused trouble to because of their action."

The criticism began almost immediately after the first three were kidnapped two weeks ago. The environment minister, Yuriko Koike, blamed them for being "reckless."

After the hostages' families asked that the government yield to the kidnappers' demand and withdraw its 550 troops from southern Iraq, they began receiving hate mail and harassing faxes and email. In the village of Japan, like the one in "The Lottery," one had to throw stones.

Even as the kidnappers were still threatening to burn alive the three hostages, Yukio Takeuchi, a top official in the foreign ministry, said of the three, "When it comes to a matter of safety and life, I would like them to be aware of the basic principle of personal responsibility."

The foreign ministry, held both in awe and resentment by the average Japanese, was the "okami" defied in this case. While foreign ministry officials are Japan's super elite, the average Japanese tends to regard them as arrogant and unhelpful, recalling how they failed to deliver in time the declaration of war against the United States in 1941 so that Japan became forever known as a sneak-attack nation.

Defying the "okami" are young Japanese, freelancers and members of non-profit organizations, a status traditionally held in low esteem in a country where the bigger one's company, the bigger is one's social rank. They also represented something more: they belong to a generation in which many have rejected traditional Japanese life. Many have gravitated instead to places like the East Village in Manhattan, looking for something undefined. Others have joined non-profit organizations to help people in Africa or Iraq, a new phenomenon here.

Others have gone to Iraq looking to report the true story, since Japan's big media have always avoided dangerous places. (Indeed, almost all the big media departed from Iraq in the last week on a government-chartered plane, leaving Japan's most important military mission since the end of World War II essentially uncovered.)

Mr. Yasuda who was in the second group of hostages and also described the stress he found here far greater than what he felt during his captivity in Iraq quit his position as a staff reporter at a regional newspaper to report as a freelancer in Iraq.

"We have to check ourselves what the Japanese government is doing in Iraq," Mr. Yasuda said in an interview tonight. "This is the responsibility on the part of Japanese citizens, but it seems as if people are leaving everything up to the government."

The "okami" reacted with fury at such defiance. Some politicians proposed a law barring Japanese from traveling to dangerous countries; even more said the hostages should pay the costs incurred by the government in securing their release.

"This is an idea that should be considered," the Yomiuri Newspaper, Japan's biggest daily, said in an editorial. "Such an act might deter other reckless, self-righteous volunteers."

When two freed hostages mentioned wanting to stay or return to Iraq to continue their work, Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi angrily urged them "to have some sense."

"Many government officials made efforts to rescue them, without even eating and sleeping, and they are still saying that sort of thing?" he said.

The comment was revealing, one that would not be uttered, at least publicly, in the United States where the government is supposed to serve the people. Here, the government is now trumpeting "personal responsibility" for those going to dangerous areas essentially saying that travelers shouldn't accept any help from the government to secure their safety or get out of trouble.

Again, no Japanese politician dared to speak out against this idea.

Indeed, Mr. Koizumi's handling of the hostage crisis translated into positive polls, and the issue diverted attention from Iraq's worsening security situation and the fact that Japan's troops, according to this country's peace Constitution, are supposed to be in a non-combat zone.

Grasping Japan's attitude toward them, the hostages found themselves under crushing pressure, Dr. Saito said.

According to him, the 18-year-old Mr. Imai registered a blood pressure of 150. Ms. Takato, who had a pulse rate of over 120 beats per minute, kept bursting into tears. When the doctor told her she had done good work in Iraq, she cried convulsively and said, "But I've done wrong, haven't I?"

On Tuesday, Ms. Takato, using the tranquilizers Dr. Saito gave her, finally left Tokyo for her hometown in Hokkaido. According to the media, she made this comment about returning to her family home, but it could just as well have been about coming back to Japan:

"I feel like going back home quickly, but I'm also afraid of going home."

April 24, 2004

Subversiveness

img_0931.jpg

I saw this typical OL (office lady) in Harajuku, and noticed that there was something subversive about her; the tatoo that you can barely notice through the panty hose. Now that I look at the picture, the shoes seem a bit much, but she was wearing a beige office type suite when I saw her, I only noticed her tatoo at the stop light, since she was standing next to me.

August 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            

Blog Groups